Board Thread:Fun and Games/@comment-39133133-20200408124334/@comment-35614398-20200412165916

ChineseSocialist wrote: MartyMcFly05 wrote: ChineseSocialist wrote: Japan:

- Developing on Heavy Bombers

- Building better infrastructure on Japanese cities, particularly Tokyo, attempting to make it a hub for world trade. Not to shit on your turn, BUT:

- There aren't even regular bombers yet, how could you have heavy bombers?

- World trade is going to be a bit difficult when you're openly hostile to most of the world's biggest economies. There are indeed bombers during World War 1. And btw, I still has trade with the Central Powers. I'm only hostile to the Entente. The first use of a bomber in combat was in 1913 and it was basically just pilots yeeting grenades out of the cockpit. Real bombers weren't a thing until the latter half of the 1910s.

And sure, Germany's a world trade power, but Sweden? Even Austria-Hungary wouldn't really be international, being stuck in the Mediterranean and all. The Ottoman economy is basically just sand, no offense to Belarusball. By vowing to 'liberate' Asia, you're going to distance all your neighbours, except China whose in a civil war, Siam who's just kinda small, and Russia, who would hate you anyway after the War of 1904.

I mean I should probably stop making unhelpful comments, but these are valid points I think.