Thread:Johnny-Swing/@comment-34650195-20180706193155/@comment-34650195-20180723083349

>1. Listen, if you can't notice the clear difference betwen authority and court sentences, it's not your problem, it's yours.

The difference between a governing organ and a court exists, but both of them are authorities. They tell people what to do based of some kind of rules that not everybody they are applied to will necessarily agree with and their own opinions. To uphold nonexistence of structures you have to create a structure or else structures will emerge and they will be far worse than modern humane structures that have undergone thousands of years of development.

2. I understand very well how the rules and logic work and that is why I understand that you don't understand them. If it would be just so easy to make everythink "logically" and just by doing everything "logically" will solve all problems why nobody has come with this up before? There is just that "logical order" that we could use any time we wanted but we just didn't. The world has hundreds of ideologies and philosophies each of which claims they are the ultimately logical way to do everything and yet they still are not the one same thing. What is judges in some settlement think that the utimate goal of humanity is to boost civilization as good as possible and will judge people for not contributing into society enough and see that as violation of NAP because society not being good enough harms others? What are you going to do with them? Are they unlogical? How? How are you more logical than them?