User blog comment:KurwaAntics/Jerusalem/@comment-32695350-20171207101951/@comment-5211495-20171207131228

The Arabs already opposed the existence of the state of Israel in the first place in 1948. The "New" Israel is meant to be a secular state, so claiming Jerusalem is legitimate in the geographical perspective - the promised land, as well as the ethnic perspective - the Jews. There is no religious perspective involved. God only gave the land to the Jewish people - based on the ethnicity, not the religion.

One more reason: Suleiman the Magnificent was buried in modern day Syria. The area around his tomb is a Turkish exclave. King David of Israel died in Jerusalem, so it is legitimate for the Jewish people to claim it.

So even if Jerusalem is claimed, if Israel is able to reclaim the Jewish land without killing innocents, they should do it. Otherwise, they should still do it. When the Jews first came to the promised land, the natives opposed, and the Jews conquered the land with force. Now the Arabs oppose the Jewish state, denying its existence. In the U.N. partition plan in 1948, Jerusalem and Bethlehem are not included in the Jewish clay. The Jews accepted it, but the Arabs didn't. And then the Arabs waged war against Israel, ended up losing the war and getting weaker every time they do it, but they don't seem to stop.

Whenever we do, Islamic terror will always come at us, that means Islamic terror no longer matters and we can do what we want.

So deal with it.