Thread:Nieuwegeinball/@comment-26478081-20191116080344/@comment-26478081-20191121141205

Nieuwegeinball wrote: Only a few things:

It isn't, but the problem with your icons is that icons of Utrecht (the city & province) already exist, not to mention most of the ones you made look EXACTLY the same as those that were already here, so the icons you made are pretty much redundant. >> So, I should only use the one that already existed? Besides, I made the first icon of Utrechtball city. He had none. =P

That being said, I can see one reason why this would happen and that might be because as a result of one certain NSFW vandal barging in 2 months ago, only the mods can replace existing images. I can see why this might result in duplicate icons being made out of necessity and I'm talking with the mods to address this. That being said, please try not to make duplicate icons, especially if they look exactly the same. >> Ok.

BTW, there is a proper way to make icons (i.e. don't add the ball suffix when making icons) >> For the ones I created so far, I used Piskel. That's fine too, right? (Oh. I did add it for the ones I already created... I won't do it again then.)

https://polandball.fandom.com/wiki/Template%3AGetIcon >> I don't get how this works yet. I might try to figure it out soon.

Thank you for your answer. :) To answer your responses, yes, you should use the one that already exists, but the mods are open to suggestions in regards to modifications of icons, Also, Utrecht city does have an icon before you made one. It's this one . As I've said, make sure to look if an icon already exists by looking it up on the wiki (File:(country/region/city name)-icon.png)

As for Piksel, you can use that to make icons, but we do have a blank icon