Thread:CommanderOz/@comment-30924651-20170310213236/@comment-27160012-20170320042505

What a way to ruin the storyline, and you happen to spend more effort than I did, unless you recycled it from your other responses.

Anyway...

I don't know how you or any organization is going to remove globalism in real life. And thanks to the internet (that made this very wiki possible), it's near-impossible to bring down in practice. Might as well start exposing the more shady businesses.

The various indigenous peoples who are practicing their harmony with the natural world would like to differ in regards to Christianity's effects (typified by the Spanish conquests). In addition, the witch-hunts, and the infamous trial against Galileo also highlighted the religion's dark side. What I personally took offence at is the church's other trial against Giordano Bruno, the first notable man who came up with the idea of exoplanets (given I like astronomy), but his case is just one of many.

Science, as important as it is, must not be used for propaganda. If an invention or discovery contradicts with commonly-held beliefs, and is verified by repeated experiments, then possibly 90% of people are wrong, even fractally wrong. Which makes the combined goals of Science and (fundamentalist) Christianity questionable at best.

Traditional values? That's vague-ish and possibly misleading. If its the traditional values of an enlightened, modern, logic-focused, progressive society then I'm fine. If it's of a barbarian state in the Middle Ages then we have a problem.

...but even then I don't know how progressive you are, given you're not American (and this wiki is diverse).