Thread:IohannesIohannium/@comment-28643601-20160807214554

Well i am not here to cause any kind of fight. First i thank you for your dedication in religionballs. But i see some mistakes.

I am a religious studious and about the Tibetan Bon, well bon is a kind of tibetan buddhism, in spite of the popular belief in a non-buddhist religion called "Bon" during the era of the Tibetan Empire, there is one evidence to support the idea. Despite differences in some aspects of other buddhists schools, Bon it was definitely a form of Buddhism. So i should put Bon as a part of Buddhism, I can do it, i am just talking here to don't have kind of fight.

And about Christianityballs, well in my opinion have some kind of "spams" in Cristianityballs parts, cause you are giving much importance to small groups and concepts that are not branches practiced within the cristian tree. Certain concepts and groups that do not have much importance had more prominence than true branches as the Anabaptists who have the Amish as clear group. So I think some balls should not be there, because they are not branches of cristianity, they are groups most of the time and although they have had a role in christian history, just taking a superficial view and erroneous on them to qualify as branches or independetes or belonging practices.

To not have any confuse in the time that i make the changes i'm warning here. And about christianityballs think about it, i think have so much content with no importance here, and is also spam the navbox. 