Thread:XxBertholdtxX/@comment-34650195-20180905062221/@comment-36832497-20180905193105

>What good there is in destroying a noble monarchy? A lot. It was barely a noble monarchy after they began intense race-mixing and also heavy plotting within the family. Good rulers such as Murad V were dismissed and retards like Abdulhamid II came to power. It just wasn't working, and either a replacement in dynasty or regime was needed.

>He didn't simply bring secularism, he opressed the majority of Turks for their beliefs, he attacked Turkish culture and he banned women who were wearing religious-cultural dress from educating. He was a man who hated his nation all but openly He did bring secularism my removing Islam from the constitution, didn't oppress anyone for his beliefs and you can find images of him doing his prayer on the internet. "he banned women who were wearing religious-cultural dress from educating", although WOMEN WERE BANNED FROM EDUCATION BEFORE HE CAME TO POWER!. "he attacked Turkish culture", which is why you can see images of him doing our traditional dances or drinking our traditional drinks, and probably why the Turkish culture is practiced to maximum even in the biggest city today.

He also didn't do anything bad to religion, in fact to lead Muslims in the correct path, he founded "Directorate of Religious Affairs", before that locals were just trusting sheiks on everything, in fact sheiks were so powerful they could get any woman stoned or any man castrated if they just wanted.

>Explain me how one thing is better than the other. Western people don't suck baby penises, and thanks to their cultures live much civilised lives than Arabs. You don't see many women being stoned to death or homosexuals being killed just for being homosexuals in Europe a lot, do you?

About Erdogan, I won't argue with you about it.