Board Thread:Political Discussion/@comment-26372275-20171001130518/@comment-30924651-20171008183911

Nothing to watch wrote: For love and happiness! wrote: Nothing to watch wrote: For love and happiness! wrote: I want to remind teveryone that Spain became liberal and democratic under the restored monarchy. Before it was fascist (Francoist) and Lenin-style authoritarian communistic. Say if I'm wrong. Spain is nowadays definitely better than 80 years ago, but beating up innocent men, women and children with batons in 21st century is still inadmissible First of all, large number of photos where Spanish police was "beating children and disabled" was proven fake.

Second of all, these people made things that gave authorities a right to use force. Such situation can occure only if protesters broke the law. And as I understand they did so. And if they did thing after which follows legal and lawful punicment by the authorities, knew that and did it willingly, why are they complaining about consequenses? It's like if you throw a stone in a police officer, he will arrest you and then you'll complain how harsh he/she was. Adult life is also about knowing and understanding such things.

Also what do you all think about my new fancy avatar? 1) Can you show me where they were proven fake?

2) IF  the protesters used violence, you would be right and I would not try to defend them, b ut these people just standed there and stopped police from f*****g up the voting stations

3) OMG, it's the Trilluminati, I will better stop arguing with you before you kill me! 1. https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-9870267

2. There is no matter did they use violence or not. There are the laws and there is the state and they set the rules. No matter what they did, they broke the law, they broke the direct orders of the lawful and legal authorities, and they were puniched. And the authorities and the laws had their reasons to consider protestors' actions as a crime, because they were distabilizing the state, threatning its souveregnity and unity and questionizing the rule of the state. Do you think a state where people can just go against the laws or a state that can just let parts of it rebel and seperate into different countries is a good state? Or if in Estonia Narva would turn separatist wouldn't you use same argument against it as I'm now?

3. http://warhammer40k.wikia.com/wiki/Legio_Invigilata