Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-28809929-20160623041306/@comment-31976227-20170830193221

For love and happiness! wrote: Olanu wrote: For love and happiness! wrote: Olanu wrote: For love and happiness! wrote: Olanu wrote: For love and happiness! wrote: Russian, Roman, British and Byzantine empires were the stronkest. Also Persia maybe. Maybe. You forgot Huns and Mongolians. If Ghenghis khan did not die, maybe mongols shoud conquer the entire Europe! Mongols - yes, but Huns - no. Huns created several empires but they all fell fastly, just like Mongol empire, because, is it good or bad, steppe riders are not good in administrating. Great thing with the Mongol empire was that it was SO great, but Huns, despite they were great too as well as their empires, never managed to create something even close to the Mongol empire, nor to other empires I listed. I understand what yo said about huns, but not about mongols. They were one of the bests at administrating. Why did they their empire then disappear to fast?

“Conquering the world on horseback is easy; it is dismounting and governing that is hard.” ― Genghis Khan Do not  You  think 162 years are a bit much? 1. They conquered A LOT.

2. Factors they had to conquer so much vere still strong and that is not same as be good in administrating. And it ended falling apart.

Correct.