Thread:Polandball & Mapping Slovenia/@comment-31674709-20180422104939/@comment-31674709-20180422144327

Polandball &amp; Mapping Slovenia wrote: 1. It's not just a piece of paper and they're defined by more than just by that declaration.

2. I've read wikipedia's positive vs negative rights article and positive rights >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> negative rights.

3. Not everyone, but many do.

4. Someone seems to not understand concept of equality and liberty (and that's you).

5. Again, taxation is not theft if you get something for it. American taxation could be considered theft because the people get very little for it while in Sweden taxation isn't theft because they get a lot of things back for it.

6. You seem to be an anarcho-capitalist. Fun fact: capitalism can't exist without a state, while socialism can (I'm still not an anarchist tho). 1. It's a mere piece of paper, end

2. Why do you preffer positive rights to negative rights? Do negative rights hurt you? Do positive rights benefit you?

3. Just because "many" do doesn't mean it's appliable.

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/bandwagon

4. Please tell me, how can forced equality be compatible with liberty?

5. Taxation is theft, it will always be theft. And no, if a thief stolled some of my money and gave me a bike in exchange, '''IT'S STILL THEFT. '''

Just because i got something back for it DOESN'T MEAN THAT THE ACTION WAS IMMORAL.

6. How exactly? Capitalism is merely a system of free people exchaning with each other, how does this require a state? How can socialism not require a state if it requires cohersion in order to violate property rights?