Thread:The Planless Crashman/@comment-33706373-20180531143007/@comment-33706373-20180601164401

First you are assuming it by yourself, you are assuming that I get informed by those vehicles while I don’t, I do read both sides but I don’t take those things as truth unlike you here on every anti China bia article

Also most articles you quoted are about things that pretty much happen in every country (maybe not in Nordic ones), USA and UK face the same things

And no China didn’t ban Winnie the Pooh ayy lmao I can’t stop laughing while talking about this. What happened was that some memes about Winnie the Pooh were circulating around Chinese social medias and this triggered the government for mocking Xi Jinping comparing him with the bear ayy lmao seriously I can’t stop laughing because I did made memes about this crap lol, and they banned it following internet censorship, but no they didn’t ban the image of the damn bear you can find Chinese kids with clothes and other Pooh stuff meh

This looks like the fake news about Syria, like: the last hospital of Aleppo, the last kitten rehabilitation center ayy lmao

And well I don’t disagree of internet censorship I think this is a necessary thing to keep a society moralized because you can find tons of immoral and degenerate shit around the internet, but this doesn’t means I agree with every censorship that the government does for its own political reasons

Xi Jinping photo is not mandatory in churches. Actually the government did some stupid things like destroying new churches and temples but it was because they were meh irregular according to the Chinese law, so meh let the fuck it be. They did build those temples and churches in a regular way later but you know lot of people like American Protestants will use this in a biased way

And about influencing Australian politicians. Well, it’s not like USA influences 98% of other countries policies, but when China does is hur dur

Also banning Peppa Pig is not a bad thing ayy lmao Peppa is a trash cartoon, lot of children are addicted in this crap, but well still you can find Peppa shit around China since they only did a poor censorship in mainstream media against the cartoon

Also please the railway accidents part both in China and USA is pathetic, even I don’t like USA I will not use it as a reason to attack them or the Chinese government

I could also argue about Hong Kong or Tibet but meh this is the typical argument were you can’t find a good side to defend so...

Most articles you quoted here are opinion articles and not legitimate ones actually. An article of opinion is as the name already says an article where the journalist writes its opinion, and since nowadays different from newspaper what give you money is online views, you don’t need to care for quality, all you need to care is for view so you write a lot of weird things to get it and put a hamburger on your table at the end of the month

Anti Japanese sentiment doesn’t necessary means discrimination or hate against every ethnic Japanese. In every part of Greater China anti Japanese sentiment is associated with political repudiation of Japan and its influence, due to the fact that Japan always harmed China throughout and never apologized for its crimes, one of the worse crimes committed by human beings. And I stated that there is no lies about it in China duh

As you said it was a war between the Japanese and the Chinese and when did the conflicts started?? Yes you already answered this question, conflicts started in 1931 with the Japanese invasion of Manchurian Chinese lands, that’s where conflicts between Chinese and Japanese started so the invasion and the conflict started this year

I didn’t say Mao was a representative of Asia and its culture, he never was, he was a representative of his own views of Marxism Leninism. However he do was an Asian and by the simple fact that he was an Asian, this opens a giant hiatus for propagation of false and prejudiced interpretations and stuff about China as whole in the West following his policies of not cooperating with its interests. And no he didn’t killed 45 million people in 4 years don’t lie, this number has no real evidence and most of the claimed evidences are including natural disasters and deaths from natural causes, he did killed lot of people but this high number is nonsense used by people to again attack China position, same thing is used by democrats in Taiwan muh not China, they say that Kai Shek was a terrible mainlander dictator that massacred innocent pure Taiwanese people, you see?? You see the logic?? You see the line you following?? And most of the people who were killed (not died for starvation) had reasons to, in authoritarian post civil war governments we need to remove opposition to build a stable society, so Kai Shek and Mao did have reasons to kill opposition

Imperial Japan followed Western ideas for its own interest, modern Japan does the same thing but in a way that makes Westerners happy, modern Japan is a reflection of Western host of a criminal entity

This is nonsense, what about Germans? Why do every single German needs to know and feel ashamed of the Holocaust and Japanese have the option of ignore and don’t know about all the terrible crimes they committed against other Asian people? Again I ask you the same question, why you guys so easily condemn the crimes committed by Germany but have so damn difficult in condemn the Japanese ones? And when you guys only care about Pearl Harbour, is it because Americans were killed? So the relevance is when Americans, Jews, British and French are killed but when Chinese and other Asian that we have enmity die we don’t care

Simply because the Japan is poor and victim of injustices by a China part is nonsense. People in a dishonest way try to hide the crimes and every bad thing Japan did against Chinese people in muh Communism and CCP propaganda, so Communism and Mao are used as a shield by those dishonest people to attack China and protect Japan guilty, in a similar way of Israel and the Holocaust, Israel uses Holocaust as an excuse to kill Arabs and receive international benefits

In relation to articles you quoted, they don’t give a specific number and make it ambiguous and open to interpretations, no article gives concretized proof that this number of people died different from the source I gave you can also check it