Board Thread:Fun and Games/@comment-30769906-20170326141045/@comment-30598593-20170402203934

Crazyball wrote: Lingball wrote: Crazyball wrote: Lingball wrote: Crazyball wrote:

Lingball wrote: And now it is impossible to send troops and armaments to North Vietnam, there is no place nowhere to send or where to arrive With all respect, but how did you pass my line? You probably moved troops from Laos. It depends on which border you are talking to, the one that you did in Hanoi, I have not dropped it yet, but I will try it soon. The border that you wanted to build in the territory of North Vietnam was simply impossible to get ready since the works were always bombed, and by the way yes, I have many troops in Laos who are fighting against the communists there and I use Laos as a bridge, it is easy to move the troops, to complete the siege With all respect you didn't write how you were bombing my troops so my line is finished. You have army in Laos but it is not so big as the army behind my line. (I guess) With all respect, yes I wrote, please read my moves and my replies, there is no way for your line to be finalized or even started since it will be constantly bombarded. In relation to the Laos, is not as great as the one who invaded North Vietnam, but it is considerable and as soon as I defeat the communists there I can restore it Well, I don't count other replies. In the last two you never mentoined bombing. So it never happened. With all respect, Crazy. If I bombed Hanoi, it's because I'm at the advantage, I wouldn't bomb only Hanoi if you had the line, which indicates that I already hinted the construction of this line, and anyway you can't build this line in only one year, realistically, you wouldn't have so much time to build and not be bombed by me or USA, so with all respect, that line can't exist. You may have built in Hanoi, but the other has no way of being possible