Thread:Veteran Geezer/@comment-30085401-20170112153610/@comment-30085401-20170119153624

Genny bianco wrote: then why is the "armenian genocide" called "armenian genocide" if armenians still exist? also "Ben Kiernan  wrote in his book   Blood and Soil: A World History of Genocide and Extermination from Sparta to Darfur  on the French conquest of   Algeria, that within 3 decades of the French conquest of Algeria in 1830, war, famine and disease [citation needed]   had reduced the original population from 3 million by a figure ranging from 500,000 to 1,000,000. [33] 'By 1875, the French conquest was complete. The war had killed approximately 825,000 indigenous Algerians since 1830. A long shadow of genocidal hatred persisted, provoking the French author to protest in 1882 that in Algeria, "we hear it repeated every day that we must expel the native and if necessary destroy him." As a French statistical journal urged five years later, "the system of extermination must give way to a policy of penetration."[34] In response to France's recognition of Armenian Genocide Turkey accused France of committing genocide against 15% of Algeria's population."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herero_and_Namaqua_genocide

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide_of_indigenous_peoples#United_States_colonization_and_westward_expansion

<p style="margin-top:0.5em;line-height:inherit;color:rgb(37,37,37);font-family:sans-serif;font-size:14px;font-weight:normal;">ok They can call anything a genocide, but he never said anything about it being partial