Thread:ShadowIranianGeneral/@comment-31674709-20180919145400/@comment-36213611-20180926174813

PragerU and the whole neoconservative movement in the US are very biased. Their arguments are shallow and without any historical foundation or greater conventual deepening.

It’s not the first time I see this type of movement working in the style of a proxy for the zionist industry in Israel, using the idea that Hizbullah is just an arm of Iran and an evil creation of Iran and everything related to be a puppet of Iran instead of a group that wants to protect the integrity and sovereignty of Lebanon from predators like Israel and Saudis.

Hizbullah is supported by more than half of Lebanese population as far as I know, that is a diverse population. It’s also a fact that considerable part of the large christian population in Lebanon is supporting them. Hizbullah operates in poor areas of the country, where the government never cared to, the Shi’as from Lebanon suffered from all problems poverty can cause in a third-world country. With the Hizbullah now, this people have access to water, electricity, school and hospitals, beside it Hizbullah also helped them rebuilding the region and even restoring churches that were damaged by the war or by the attacks of the Israelis.

Yes we from Iran are proud to say we help Hizbullah in their both military and social wings, where they have being helping, improving and even saving the lives of many Lebanese. If the neoconservatives complain so much about it, it’s because something is bothering their pockets. I’m sure they wouldn't open their mouths if the Saudi family took care of the situation in Lebanon or Syria, and we would just wait for, to see how the countries under the Saudi “guardianship” would be going, like Somalia, Libya that doesn't even has a government anymore, or maybe even Yemen. Iran will help every movement that is legit of a resistance, we support good people because we are humans and this is independent of ethnicity and religion.

American nervousness in trying to dominate the region's economy to maintain its uncontrolled economic policy around the world has proven to be one of the biggest failures ever committed by such a nation. In addition to the damage caused to local populations, the infamous strategic and tactical support to truly terrorist, violent and extremist groups, seems to all have been destined to a major hell. These all interests seem to be difficult to satisfy, the system they created around it is like a snake that bites the own tail.

Now Iranian influence in Iraq was a fatal blow for the US, later expansion to Syria, US destabilizing those countries is not something that must be accepted, if Iran as a country wants to survive we need to interfere in the American plans to the region, because that is their way to act, they eat one then the other one, from Syria to Iraq until they get us. The destruction of Iran under any pathetic justification that is like "democracy, freedom" is something necessary for the US to avoid the collapse of the monopoly that they founded in the world.

This whole petrodollar monopoly of the US as it is at the moment, when it comes to the point where all this has been arrived, letting it by their own, may be perhaps heading to an eminent end of it. Not an end of US as country but of this policy.