Thread:Hendrik498/@comment-31790865-20180725005736/@comment-34650195-20180810074146

Hendrik498 wrote: Anarchism advocates for a world where people co-operate to make their lives better rather than being ruled by someone who earns money they don't deserve by having a title. In my opinion, rulers are bad, they care about the well-being of their national status and diplomacy more than they care care about the life of each individual within their borders. That's the reason why anarchists hate hirearchy, but it's besides the point.

Here's your answer to why it is fruitful. In an anarchist community, literally everyone's opinion and desires is taken into consideration, every single individual. While democracy favours the greater good, on an election with six candidates where one wins with 30% of the votes, 70% of the country is going to be ruled by someone they don't want to be ruled by. Monarchy is even worse, because you have no way of legally determining or changing the ruler if you don't like the current one, on top of that, the royal family is viewed and praised as superior human beings to you. In anarchism, each percent of the population's opinion will be considered and they will be treated how they want to, and will have a life they want to have.

Another thing anarchism is for is that, just about everything is voluntary, nobody is ever forced into doing anything, if you don't want to or don't think you need to do a certain thing, then you will have the option of not doing it.

That's the backbone of anarchism, individual freedom. If today the entire world was anarchist, I would be living in an anarcho-syndicalist commune, you would be living in a Metaxist commune, rather than being part of the smaller part of the percentage who didn't get the ruler they want. This is my image of anarcho-syndicalism. Keep in mind though, that someone else might give you a different answer so don't take my sentences (except for the ones about individual freedom) as universal for all anarchists. Dude are you that naive?