Thread:Ashkenazicube/@comment-27039283-20161020183627/@comment-30924651-20170310171557

No. Liberalism and Nazism both think about nations. Yes, liberals may want to be internationalistic, but their internationalism is growing from idea that nations are important and we can talk about them like about something that is upper than Monarchy. Nazism praises idea of nation too, and also an idea of race as some subjects. Both have national government. Nazis just understand their leader as some kind of clan's standard bearer and liberals belive in democracy. Indea of Sacred Monarchy means that races, nations and other stuff are just not importan. Thre is sacred authoritarian Ruler and he is the state and statedom itself. So for liberals ruler is just a leader of nation, but for Fourth Path and Monarchism leader is state, nation, empire and reprezenter of God in the politic. And all andministrations and aristocracy just helps him.

So Nazism was just trying to create authoritarian monarchy and state based on race, nation and other things like that same time. And if leader's power is not based on Sacred Monarchy or another powerful idea like Commusnism or peace between different nations in same state, he needs something else. And it is a nation/race. And if he is praising a nation, he needs some sort of enemy. That scheme is not always so bad, that enemy can be corruption or some evil totalitarian state. But Hitler chose a way of hatred to other nations and races. And that was terrible choise.