User blog comment:Legionnaire12/Debunking Amal's criticisim/@comment-36028840-20180705165324

Your so claimed "debunk" is in a nutshell despacito. You know, you didn't debunked anything and just opened hell a lot of gaps that holds what I say as valid. 1 - Imperialist propaganda exists and USA uses it all the time as an excuse to go to war in middle east, or when is to bomb enemy countries like Serbia and Syria, or to put sanctions against countries they don't like or to do anything that don't please them and their zionist overlords. 2 - I didn't said disney is owned by cia or royal family I said both of them had influence in the creation and production of the story. disney makes cartoon with political messages, since before ww2. Also the USA already wasted its time on kid's film propaganda, whether they were subtle (like here in the case) or direct, examples, ww2 and cold war, all the time, it's all propaganda, see the one who want, the one who doesn't closes the eye and becomes idiot like you. 3 - Yes I gave my points and you didn't debunked it in your shitstorm here 4 - Not only I'm talking of my childhood but of the childhood of any child on the world who read the original story, not the manipulated one of disney. 5 - Exactly so, again you have opened another gap in your so claimed "debunk". If disney and others filled their films during the cold war with anti soviet propaganda, what guarantees that they couldn't put some anti iranian and anti shia references in their films at a time when they are being against the american global empire? 6 - Yes the name and all the other characteristics that I gave but you idiot didn't mention. 7 - Yes he did. 8 - First disney is not a nation and I never said that, yes it's a film company that never cared about making propaganda or hiding messages and references to other topics in its films. If american politics influenced disney during ww2 and the cold war, it's clear that things wouldn't stop there. 9 - You say it is an useless evidence, ok and 4 is not the answer of 2 + 2, it's easy to say it's useless when you simply ignore it. 10 - So, you present us with this useless sentence with no other backing. If you read this entire thing, you will find no evidence of why this is anti-revolution. 11 - I made, you retarded piece of an imperialist scum. What you need to see is, things are not simply thrown in your face, it's a matter of refferences and interpretations. Khomeini was the major leader of the revolution that overthrew a monarch, Jafar in the film does the same thing, Khomeini was represented by propaganda as a corrupt leader who wanted to dominate Iran to cause chaos, just like Jafar in the film, you see it's a set of propaganda and refferences of that time. 12 - It is a refference retarded boy, just because it is a sultan instead of a shah, king, emperor put what the fuck of name you want doesn't changes what I said, it's a refference. 13 - As I said it is a matter of abstract refferences, and of course dumb person like you will not get it just like most part of american population who live constantly manipulated by globalists. Also stop saying that you are a conservative by god, you are not a conservative, you are a neocon, a neocuck