Thread:For love and happiness!/@comment-29029659-20170809155527/@comment-30924651-20170810103022

Kalašnjikov wrote: Did he do something wrong? thinking_emoji.png Like economical triumph before WWI? The irony is that every single thing that Communists condem him was actually far worse in USSR.

> Also Tsar comes from Caesar which was a title for Roman emperors so it's better.

Yes, but in late Russian empire "czar" was something between "king" and "emperor". He was a czar of Siberia, Astrakhan, Kazan, king/czar (title is different on different languages) of Poland, but when it comes to Russia itself, he was an emperor.

Here is a list of titles:

" By the Grace of God, We, NN, Emperor and Autocrat of All the Russias, Moscow, Kiev, Vladimir, Novgorod; Tsar of Kazan, Tsar of Astrakhan, Tsar of Poland, Tsar of Siberia, Tsar of Chersonese Taurian, Tsar of Georgia; Lord of Pskov and Grand Prince of Smolensk, Lithuania, Volhynia, Podolia, Finland; Prince of Estland, Livland, Courland, Semigalia, Samogitia, Belostok, Karelia, Tver, Yugorsky land, Perm, Vyatka, Bolgar and others; Lord and Grand Prince of Nizhny Nogorod, Chernigov, Ryazan, Polotsk, Rostov, Yaroslavl, Belozersk, Udorsky land, Obdorsk, Kondia, Vitebsk, Mstislav, and all of the northern countries Master; and Lord of Iberia, Kartli, and Kabardia lands and Armenian provinces; hereditary Sovereign and ruler of the Circassian and Mountainous Princes and of others; Lord of Turkestan; Heir of Norway; Duke of Schleswig-Holstein, Stormarn, Dithmarschen, and Oldenburg, and others, and others, and others."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emperor_of_All_Russia